ECODESIGN online PILOT

Reducing consumption at use stage

Improvement <- D: use intensive <-

Checklist for ECODESIGN analysis

Product

Can an environmentally harmful abuse of the product be excluded, are there incentives for correct behavior?
  
  
What environmentally relevant malfunctions may occur in using the product? How can environmentally harmful operating errors be avoided? What incentives or aids (e.g. displaying consumption) could promote correct user behavior?
Relevance (R) Fulfillment (F) Priority (P)
very important ( 10 )
less important ( 5 )
not relevant ( 0 )
yes ( 1 )
rather yes ( 2 )
rather no ( 3 )
no ( 4 )

P = R * F
Measure Prevent environmentally harmful abuse of product
Idea for
Realization
Costs
more
same
less
because
Feasibility
difficult
easy
because
Action
at once
later
never
Responsibility
Deadline


Is the level of consumption of the product indicated to the user?
  
  
What quantities of resources does the product consume at use stage? How can consumption be measured and can it be indicated to the user? Is it possible to identify consumption per service unit?
Relevance (R) Fulfillment (F) Priority (P)
very important ( 10 )
less important ( 5 )
not relevant ( 0 )
yes ( 1 )
rather yes ( 2 )
rather no ( 3 )
no ( 4 )

P = R * F
Measure Indicate consumption of product along use stage
Idea for
Realization
Costs
more
same
less
because
Feasibility
difficult
easy
because
Action
at once
later
never
Responsibility
Deadline


Does the product consume only a minimum of energy per service unit?
  
  
How could a service unit be defined for the product? What is the overall energy consumption of the product? How much is that in relation to one service unit of the product? What is the resulting overall efficiency of the product?
Relevance (R) Fulfillment (F) Priority (P)
very important ( 10 )
less important ( 5 )
not relevant ( 0 )
yes ( 1 )
rather yes ( 2 )
rather no ( 3 )
no ( 4 )

P = R * F
Measure Minimize energy consumption at use stage by increasing efficiency of product
Idea for
Realization
Costs
more
same
less
because
Feasibility
difficult
easy
because
Action
at once
later
never
Responsibility
Deadline


Has an energy-efficient principle of function been chosen for the product?
  
  
What is the main function of the product? How is energy supplied? What energy transformation processes are involved in the product's service life? Is energy transformation efficient? Are there other principles able to fulfill the required function? What is the energy balance for each case?
Relevance (R) Fulfillment (F) Priority (P)
very important ( 10 )
less important ( 5 )
not relevant ( 0 )
yes ( 1 )
rather yes ( 2 )
rather no ( 3 )
no ( 4 )

P = R * F
Measure Minimize energy demand at use stage by choosing an adequate principle of function
Idea for
Realization
Costs
more
same
less
because
Feasibility
difficult
easy
because
Action
at once
later
never
Responsibility
Deadline


Are renewable energy sources being used at use stage?
  
  
What energy sources are at disposal for the use stage? Is it possible to use renewables? What alternatives could replace conventional drive units/power sources?
Relevance (R) Fulfillment (F) Priority (P)
very important ( 10 )
less important ( 5 )
not relevant ( 0 )
yes ( 1 )
rather yes ( 2 )
rather no ( 3 )
no ( 4 )

P = R * F
Measure Make possible use of renewable energy resources at use stage
Idea for
Realization
Costs
more
same
less
because
Feasibility
difficult
easy
because
Action
at once
later
never
Responsibility
Deadline


Does the product consume only a minimum of auxiliary and process materials at use stage?
  
  
What auxiliary and process materials are required at use stage? What quantities? How much is that in relation to one service unit? What measures could reduce the amount of auxiliary and process materials consumed at use stage?
Relevance (R) Fulfillment (F) Priority (P)
very important ( 10 )
less important ( 5 )
not relevant ( 0 )
yes ( 1 )
rather yes ( 2 )
rather no ( 3 )
no ( 4 )

P = R * F
Measure Design product for minimum consumption of process materials
Idea for
Realization
Costs
more
same
less
because
Feasibility
difficult
easy
because
Action
at once
later
never
Responsibility
Deadline


Are the auxiliary and process materials required for using the product environmentally acceptable, do they have little environmental impact?
  
  
What auxiliary and process materials are required for using the product? Are they environmentally acceptable? Can the auxiliary and process materials used at present be replaced by alternative materials?
Relevance (R) Fulfillment (F) Priority (P)
very important ( 10 )
less important ( 5 )
not relevant ( 0 )
yes ( 1 )
rather yes ( 2 )
rather no ( 3 )
no ( 4 )

P = R * F
Measure Make possible use of environmentally sound process materials
Idea for
Realization
Costs
more
same
less
because
Feasibility
difficult
easy
because
Action
at once
later
never
Responsibility
Deadline


Is it possible to operate the product with auxiliary and process materials based on renewable raw materials?
  
  
What auxiliary and process materials are required for operation of the product? Is there an alternative based on renewable raw materials? Could these be used without modifying the technology?
Relevance (R) Fulfillment (F) Priority (P)
very important ( 10 )
less important ( 5 )
not relevant ( 0 )
yes ( 1 )
rather yes ( 2 )
rather no ( 3 )
no ( 4 )

P = R * F
Measure Make possible use of process materials from renewable raw materials
Idea for
Realization
Costs
more
same
less
because
Feasibility
difficult
easy
because
Action
at once
later
never
Responsibility
Deadline



Approach to assessment:
  1. Relevance:
    Rate the relevance of the assessment question with a view to your product. (10...very important for my product; 5...less important for my product; 0...not relevant for my product).
  2. Fullfilment:
    Estimate the fulfilment of the assessment questions using one of the four possible answers (yes / rather yes / rather no / no); the additional questions support understanding of the assessment question and need not be answered.
  3. Priority:
    Select ECODESIGN tasks with high priority (P) and continue only with these.
  4. Idea for Realization:
    Find ideas to realize these ECODESIGN tasks. The content of the learning part with its examples shall assist you in doing that.
  5. Feasibility:
    Evaluate the feasibility of the suggested ideas (difficult / easy).
  6. Costs:
    Compare the costs of the new ideas with a reference situation (higher / same / lower) and give reason for that.
  7. Action:
    Decide when to carry out the ECODESIGN tasks (at once / later / never) and determine the person or department that shall be in charge of further steps in the realizing the product improvements and fix a deadline.
  8. Save:
    Save the checklist to document the ECODESIGN assessment.

 

top design & copyright © Vienna TU, Institute for Engineering Design - ECODESIGN

Prevent environmentally harmful abuse of product

Environmentally sound user behavior may considerably influence the consumption of materials and energy at use stage. In this context product development can offer incentives and support to promote positive behavior. Direct feedback to the user, e.g. by displaying current consumption of energy/materials may be helpful in this sense. So-called economy buttons but also instruction and information (e.g. required quantity of detergent) constitute adequate instruments to prevent damage to the environment through abuse of the product.


Indicate consumption of product along use stage

In order to avoid excessive consumption (energy, process materials...) at use stage the level of consumption should be indicated to the user. Making environmentally harmful behavior visible may help to avoid it, and an appropriate modification of user behavior contributes to a reduction of consumption. The technical implementation is not always as simple as is the case with current consumption; however, adequate information will enable the user to estimate consumption (e.g. different washing programs and energy consumption).


Minimize energy consumption at use stage by increasing efficiency of product

Active (current using) products may consume more resources at use stage than was required for their manufacture. Usually, energy consumption for the operation of the product is a crucial factor. The European energy label indicates different classes of energy consumption for various products (washing machines, refrigerators, freezers...) is to support the customer in his purchase decision. While, on the one hand, low energy consumption is used as a positive feature in advertising, suppliers also try to push sales emphasizing the high power input of certain products (kitchen appliances, vacuum cleaners...). This is used to underline the outstanding power of the product, although it does not say much about the quality of a product. New paths should be considered to communicate high performance at low consumption levels (e.g. for vacuum cleaners by indicating cleaning power, expressed in max. pressure difference instead of power input).


Minimize energy demand at use stage by choosing an adequate principle of function

One and the same technical function usually can be realized by means of several different principles of action. Selecting an adequate principle of action should, therefore, take into account the energy demand of a product at use stage. Thus, product design should avoid solutions requiring great masses to be constantly accelerated and decelerated. Any form of friction or damping (mechanical braking or electrical resistance) constitutes a loss of energy. Using light emitting diodes (LED's) instead of filament bulbs in traffic lights, flashlights, ... may serve as examples of an adequate choice of the principle of function. Here, less energy is wasted by heat radiation that cannot be used otherwise.


Make possible use of renewable energy resources at use stage

Renewable energy sources (e.g. wind energy) are already rather common, even in production plants. In addition, renewables seem also promising for direct operation of certain products and may contribute considerably to environmental acceptability. So-called wind-ups, hand-operated appliances (e.g. in flashlights, radio sets, charging sets,...) not only avoid batteries or accumulators but also ensure operational reliability. Depending on location and daytime a combination with photovoltaic elements is another alternative.


Design product for minimum consumption of process materials

Type and quantity of auxiliary and process materials, particularly if used in active (consumption-intensive) products, are a crucial factor with a view to overall consumption of resources. In many cases, large quantities of "gray" energy or substances are hidden in auxiliary and process materials. This seems obvious with fuels or detergents, with other resources such as water (pumping energy for the generation of pressure), however, this fact is less visible. Thus, not only the conservation of resources has to be addressed but also the energy needed to supply them to the end user. Both aspects may be influenced in a positive way (see example: toilet cistern with saver device) by environmentally sound product design.


Make possible use of environmentally sound process materials

In the overall assessment of the environmental acceptability of a product auxiliary and process materials play an important part. They also must be taken into account and evaluated. Apart from the quantity consumed, the quality of auxiliary and process materials is an important factor in an environmental assessment. Avoid auxiliary and process materials that are hazardous, toxic or otherwise constitute a risk to the environment.


Make possible use of process materials from renewable raw materials

An increasing number of applications – including auxiliary and process materials – use renewable raw materials. Lubricants and detergents made from plant-based materials are already available. They perform as well as conventional materials, however, as they are renewable (non-fossil materials) they are an important contribution to sustainable development.